The four options a restoration shop has, side by side.

The status quo, your vendor's AI, a chatbot with plugins, or Ruby: what each one gets you.

Option 1

The status quo: disconnected systems

Any question that spans two systems means someone pulling reports by hand. Each one costs a little time, and across every job that time comes out of margin.

You get: what you have today.

Option 2

Your vendor's AI: smart inside one box

Useful inside that one system and blind outside it. A restoration job lives across six systems, and an assistant that sees one of them misses most of the job.

You get: one tool's view.

Option 3

A generic LLM with a pile of plugins

It can reach your data but knows nothing about the trade. It starts from zero every morning and does nothing unless asked.

You get: access without resolution.

Option 4, the best fit

Ruby

  • One picture of each job. The Albi project, the Encircle file and the CompanyCam photos are one job.

  • Knows the trade. Grounded in the trade's published standards, sources cited.

  • Works without being asked. Playbooks on a schedule or trigger catch the gap on day 1.

  • Has seen what gets paid. 100,000+ insurance claims of payment intelligence.

  • Auditable. Every action permissioned and logged; people approve anything external.

What each option covers.

Five things a restoration company needs from an assistant, and where each option stands on them.

CapabilityStatus quoVendor AILLM + pluginsRuby
Sees the whole value chainNoNoPartialaccess without resolutionYes
Knows the restoration tradeN/APartialone domainNoYes
Works without being askedNoPartialinside its own toolNoYes
Payment intelligenceNoNoNoYes
Audit trail and permissionsPartialper systemPartialper systemNoYes

Sees the whole value chain

Status quo
No
Vendor AI
No
LLM + plugins
Partialaccess without resolution
Ruby
Yes

Knows the restoration trade

Status quo
N/A
Vendor AI
Partialone domain
LLM + plugins
No
Ruby
Yes

Works without being asked

Status quo
No
Vendor AI
Partialinside its own tool
LLM + plugins
No
Ruby
Yes

Payment intelligence

Status quo
No
Vendor AI
No
LLM + plugins
No
Ruby
Yes

Audit trail and permissions

Status quo
Partialper system
Vendor AI
Partialper system
LLM + plugins
No
Ruby
Yes

The standard of care vs. the standard of payment.

Any good tool can grade your documentation against the standard of care. Only Ruby grades your file against what carriers dispute, cut, settle and deny. The standard of care tells you what’s defensible. Ruby tells you what gets paid.

What payment intelligence means

See it on your own jobs.